Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Article Title: Comparison of Drusen Volume Assessed by Two Different OCT Devices

doi: 10.3390/jcm9082657

Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative example of different drusen segmentations. Left: unsegmented B-scan of Heidelberg Spectralis Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) ( A ) and Zeiss Swept-Source PlexElite Optical Coherence Tomography (SS-OCT) ( B ). Middle: machine inbuilt segmentation of Heidelberg ( C ) and Zeiss SS-OCT ARI network test algorithm based on Cirrus segmentation algorithm ( D ). Right: segmentation of Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT ( E ) and Zeiss SS-OCT B-scan ( F ) B-scan using customized, third-party Discovery software, respectively.

Article Snippet: The mean 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle manually corrected drusen volume determined by Heidelberg SD-OCT was significantly different from the Zeiss SS-OCT assessed and manually corrected 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume with a moderate correlation (mean difference: 0.1231 ± 0.0371 mm 3 , p -value ≤ 0.001, corr. p ≤ 0.001, correlation of r = 0.681) ( A).

Techniques: Tomography, Software

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Article Title: Comparison of Drusen Volume Assessed by Two Different OCT Devices

doi: 10.3390/jcm9082657

Figure Lengend Snippet: En face view of segmented drusen volume acquired with Zeiss SS-OCT on the infrared image with full segmentation ( A ) and subsampled segmentation ( B ).

Article Snippet: The mean 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle manually corrected drusen volume determined by Heidelberg SD-OCT was significantly different from the Zeiss SS-OCT assessed and manually corrected 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume with a moderate correlation (mean difference: 0.1231 ± 0.0371 mm 3 , p -value ≤ 0.001, corr. p ≤ 0.001, correlation of r = 0.681) ( A).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Article Title: Comparison of Drusen Volume Assessed by Two Different OCT Devices

doi: 10.3390/jcm9082657

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean measurements for central 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume.

Article Snippet: The mean 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle manually corrected drusen volume determined by Heidelberg SD-OCT was significantly different from the Zeiss SS-OCT assessed and manually corrected 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume with a moderate correlation (mean difference: 0.1231 ± 0.0371 mm 3 , p -value ≤ 0.001, corr. p ≤ 0.001, correlation of r = 0.681) ( A).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Article Title: Comparison of Drusen Volume Assessed by Two Different OCT Devices

doi: 10.3390/jcm9082657

Figure Lengend Snippet: Scatterplot of SD-OCT drusen volume acquired using fully automated segmentation and manually corrected drusen volume. In general, manually corrected drusen volume was larger than automatic acquired volume and discrepancy increased with increasing drusen volume.

Article Snippet: The mean 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle manually corrected drusen volume determined by Heidelberg SD-OCT was significantly different from the Zeiss SS-OCT assessed and manually corrected 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume with a moderate correlation (mean difference: 0.1231 ± 0.0371 mm 3 , p -value ≤ 0.001, corr. p ≤ 0.001, correlation of r = 0.681) ( A).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Article Title: Comparison of Drusen Volume Assessed by Two Different OCT Devices

doi: 10.3390/jcm9082657

Figure Lengend Snippet: Inter-device comparison between SD-OCT and SS-OCT device.

Article Snippet: The mean 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle manually corrected drusen volume determined by Heidelberg SD-OCT was significantly different from the Zeiss SS-OCT assessed and manually corrected 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume with a moderate correlation (mean difference: 0.1231 ± 0.0371 mm 3 , p -value ≤ 0.001, corr. p ≤ 0.001, correlation of r = 0.681) ( A).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine

Article Title: Comparison of Drusen Volume Assessed by Two Different OCT Devices

doi: 10.3390/jcm9082657

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Scatter plot illustrating 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume assessed by machine inbuilt algorithm of Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT after manual correction ( Y -axis) vs. the Zeiss SS-OCT assessed and manually corrected 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume ( X -axis). ( B ) Scatter plot illustrating 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume of Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT assessed by customized software ( Y -axis) vs. respective drusen volume of Zeiss SS-OCT assessed by customized software ( X -axis).

Article Snippet: The mean 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle manually corrected drusen volume determined by Heidelberg SD-OCT was significantly different from the Zeiss SS-OCT assessed and manually corrected 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volume with a moderate correlation (mean difference: 0.1231 ± 0.0371 mm 3 , p -value ≤ 0.001, corr. p ≤ 0.001, correlation of r = 0.681) ( A).

Techniques: Software

Journal: Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology

Article Title: Choroid vascular index in myopic patients – A mini review

doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00062

Figure Lengend Snippet: Characteristics of optical coherence tomography, segmentation strategies, and binarization thresholds

Article Snippet: Wang et al . (b)[ ] , SS-OCT with a 12-mm radial line scan protocol (VG200S; SVision Imaging, Henan, China) , Automated segmentation using a custom deep learning algorithm based on a modified residual U-Net architecture, with manual validation if needed , Niblack auto-local threshold for segmenting choroidal boundaries and calculating CVI.

Techniques: Tomography, Software, Imaging, Modification, Biomarker Discovery

Journal: Journal of Microscopy

Article Title: Optical coherence tomography

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03619.x

Figure Lengend Snippet: Essential parameters in OCT

Article Snippet: Tuning speeds in excess of 5 MHz ( Wieser et al ., 2010 ) makes the SS-OCT the fastest scanning OCT method that has lead to sufficient quality of in vivo images acquired from tissue to date ( Klein et al ., 2011 ).

Techniques: